Search This Blog

Friday, April 29, 2016

Now for something entirely different:  thirty three years ago, I began graduate studies in the Division of Humanities at the University of Chicago.  My field of study was Chinese Art History.  For the five years that followed I wrote research papers on Chinese art history, literature and history.  Then a turn of events necessitated my departure from academia and plunged me into the world of business.  My ability to look at previously unknown objects and turn out pages of organized research went dormant. Sometime in 2006 we acquired this piece of Buddhist sculpture, its provenance unknown. I have looked at it for many years before I gathered enough courage and made this attempt at research using the same analytical methods that previously served me well.

Niche on an Ornamental Base with Guardian Lions

An unpublished research paper by Margaret Chung, AM University of Chicago



The niche with an assembly of Buddhist figures is carved from a block of micaceous marble.  It is placed on an elaborately carved square base, also made of the same material.  The form is unusual and can be viewed as a grotto in miniature. For ease of carving, the top slab appeared to have been removed and then restored upon completion.  n a symmetrical plane, the Buddha Sakyamuni emanates from the center and is flanked by his attendants in a semi-circle extending beyond the niche’s interior. He is seated cross-legged on a lotus throne, his right hand in abhaya mudra, and his left hand resting on his knee in the varada mudra. Behind him, around the circumference of the nimbus are four soaring apsarases with flying scarves.  

 


.

On his right and left are two monks, Ananda and Kasyapa,  Their faces are almost similar, though by tradition, Ananda the young monk stands on Sakyamuni’s right and Kasyapa the older on the left. The monks stand with their hands folded in their sleeves and next to them are two bodhisattvas.  They are plainly attired save a pectoral neck band and double strands of flowing scarves across the dhoti.  Their upheld right hands hold lotus buds antheir left hands hold a heart shaped fan.  Next to the bodhisattvas and behind the lokapalas are donor figures.  The one to the right of Buddha has been damaged in the face.


Seen only from the waist up, both donors wear the voluminous garments, their hands tucked in the sleeves and resting on the halos of the lokapalas.  The lokapala on the right holds a long sword and the other has his hands in tight fists across his chest. Two dvarapalas with bare chests stand on guard at the exterior of the niche under the hanging  strand of lotus blossoms framing each wall.  The musculature of their well toned body is clearly defined. With their right arms up and left arms tautly extended in a martial gesture, they are fine manifestations of powerful guardians. The assembly of figures is placed under an elaborately carved canopy with scallop edge plaited drapery.  Specks of mica are spotted here and there.



The niche’s exterior is left unfinished on the sides and backs.  Was that the intent or were the surfaces saved for inscription and more carving?  The niche is supported by a beautifully ornamented marble base, finished on all four sides with the same design.  At the top on which the niche rests is a band of repeat pattern of double upturn lotus petals.  Underneath are three dwarf caryatids or atlas figures.  Each dwarf strikes a different pose.  Like the dvarapalas, the musculature of each dwarf is well defined. Two lion dogs sitting on their haunches act as guardians at the upper corners.

In Buddhist sculptures, assemblies of multiple figures are common.  Each composition is an illustration of a particular sutra, done in accordance to a prescribed iconography.  In the case of the marble niche, the makeup of this particular pantheon of the Buddha figure accompanied by bodhisattvas, lokapalas, dvarapalas, lions and donors are rarely seen before the Tang Dynasty (CE 618-907.)  The best example of such a grouping is the assembly accompanying the colossal image of Vairocana at the Fengxian Temple of Longman, Henan Province.  The Fengxian Temple was constructed after the mid 7 century with support from Empress Wu Zetian (CE 625-705.) 

Lu She Na Buddha

(photo credit Wikipedia Fengxian Temple Longmen Grottoes)


Upon the review of the groups named above, the construction of the marble niche clearly predates the construction of the Fengxian Temple at Longman.  The serenely seated Buddha and the columnar forms of the standing dvarapala monks and bodhisattvas with square fleshy faces are more reminiscent of Northern Qi sculptures.  The canopy with the line of triangular forms superimposed on the plaited drapery is even more evocative of earlier times.  Inasmuch as the enlivened figures of thedvarapalas portrayed with upturned head ribbons and long flying scarves are more animated, it is not an exception but rather a rule for guardian figures. 

In the assignment of a date, the base should also be taken into consideration.  The marble base with the dwarf atlas figures bears a close resemblance to a pedestal base of a similar design and of the same material that was excavated and accessioned in 1954 to the Beilin Museum of Xi’an in Shaanxi Province.  This base without the two lion dogs was made to support a statue.  It is dated by inscription to 706 and measures 57cm in length, 53cm in width and 39cm high.  According to the inscription, the base was one of four commissioned by Fazang (CE 643-712,) a scholar who had great expertise on the Avatamsaka Sutra (Huayan Sutra) even before he became the founder of the Huayan School.  Under the patronage of Empress Wu, Huayan Buddhism flourished and temples were built in Luoyang as well as Chang’an. It is believed that these bases were made in veneration of the Huayan Patriarchs, of which Fazang was the third and their relics were housed in the five stupas built on the compound of the Huayan Temple outside of present day Xi’an. Today only the first and the fourth stupas are left standing.

Is it even plausible to link the the niche with the base together within the same time of manufacture?  The answer is no. Although they look the same, the depiction of the lions on the marble niche base predates the Tang period and the dwarf figures are often seen in Northern Qi sculptures.  It is possible that the aesthetics of the base is so pleasing that it has become a design for bases in Buddhist sculptures.  The reason why it is rarely seen is probably due to the time and labor required for its making. Besides, the Buddhist persecution that took place around 846 destroyed an immeasurable number of Buddhist images. In addition, it was really fortuitous that the marble niche fits exactly into the base and the visible chips and losses probably resulted when the niche was removed from the base after a long period of time.

            In the construction of the marble niche, the artisans made skillful use of the space.  In their efforts to preserve the accurate iconographic prescription, the artisans took liberty in the juxtaposition of the deities.  During the conversations with the late Harrie Vanderstappen, my mentor at the University of Chicago and other people in the field, I have gained some understanding of this object.  According to Father Vanderstappen, marble is a medium for use by those who enjoyed imperial patronage.  Could the donor figures be imperial personages?  They are even adorned with halos, and stand on the same level with the bodhisattvas, a highly unusual practice for donor figures who are portrayed in a small size and in kneeling in adoration. Others have suggested that it is the base of a reliquary to be placed within a cave tomb high on a hill, thus making it unnecessary to finish the niche’s side walls.  For what purpose did this marble niche and base serve, I may never know.  But based on the stylistic analysis of the figures compared with other marble sculptures of the same period, Northern Qi is a likely date.

This dating is further supported by a theory that I formulated based on the history of the Avatamsaka Sutra in China.  The first full translation was made in 420 CE.  The ruling house of the Northern Qi was very religious.  It is highly lightly that the members were reading the Avatamsaka sutra, where this particular iconography of Buddha flanked by two monks, two bodhisattvas, two lokapalas and two dvarapalas is associated with.  Therefore this marble niche would predate the the sculptures at Longmen.


Dimensions:
The marble niche: 53cm x 36cm x 41cm high
Buddha: 24cm high (from lotus base to top of halo)
Monk: 20cm high
Bodhisattva: 24cm high
Donor: 14cm (from chest to top of halo)
Lokapala: 14cm high
Dvarapala: 25cm high

Marble base: 65cm square
Dwarf caryatid: 10cm high
Lion: 10cm high

Total height of niche on base: 65cm

The Marble Niche and Base is offered for sale through www.liveauctioneers.com  in the following link:
https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/45075516_marble-niche-on-an-ornamental-base-with-guardian-lions

*********************************************************************************
Stylistic analysis was a methodology taught by my mentor the late Harrie Vanderstappen, In the absence of provenance, and supporting evidence based on archaeological finds of related materials, it appears to be a plausible method of dating.  Any other approach to dating is open for discussion.  Please feel free to leave remarks.